
One of the many 50th Anniversary Logos. Source: The Doctor Who Site
I’m halfway through “The Armageddon Factor.” I had hoped to finish it sooner, but I’m in that end-of-semester rush to get everything done. Two projects are due next week, then I have finals the following week. In the face of such things, Doctor Who just has to take a back seat. I’ve even fallen behind on watching the new series, which I’ve actually been enjoying this time around. While I have occasionally been irritated with what Steven Moffat has been doing with the show, I applaud his efforts to bring in new writers. A show cannot celebrate and embrace its potential to do anything and go anywhere if the same writers are brought back again and again. I genuinely appreciate the classic series’ diversity of writers—which sometimes succeeded and sometimes failed—and I have wanted to see more of that in the new series.
But moving on to the main topic: I am somewhat perplexed that in what should be a celebratory time for all fans of Doctor Who, I feel slightly indifferent. Fifty years is a big deal, especially for a show that appeared dead when the 90s arrived. But over the last couple of months as details were confirmed about the 50th anniversary special, I struggled to find excitement. A huge question popped into my head: what could Doctor Who do to celebrate the 50th anniversary that hasn’t already been done—or that would even be possible? It was practically a given that David Tennant would return; he was vocally a massive fan and a multiple-Doctor story is an anniversary tradition. But Christopher Eccleston returning was extremely unlikely (and confirmed to be not happening). Many classic series fans would love to see a classic-era Doctors, but that seems unlikely as well since many are either dead or no longer look the part. And let’s face it: we want this 50th anniversary special to connect in some way to the history of what has come before. We want a special that celebrates its roots while looking toward the future. Regardless of how one feels about the James Bond film Skyfall, it understood this on some level; it set the final action piece at the Bond family home. The movie tried to connect in some way to the past, to connect in some way that was more than just a few clever lines used to reference previous films.
And so, what I would truly like to see in the 50th anniversary special is the First Doctor. Yes, this is partly because I have become a huge fan of William Hartnell over the course of this blog, but it is also because the Hartnell era planted everything this franchise grew from. This may well happen; I know there are rumors to the effect, but as we all know in Moffat-era Who, rumors are often just rumors.
I actually feel sorry for Steven Moffat and the BBC. How can they possibly live up to the anticipation? How can they fulfill the expectations of all fans? As mentioned earlier, a multi-Doctor story is the main tradition. Bringing back an old companion? It’s been done (“The Five Doctors”, “The Two Doctors”, “School Reunion”). Release novels featuring previous Doctors? It’s been done (Virgin’s Missing Adventures, BBC’s Past Doctor Adventures, The Wheel of Ice). Release a comic that features one incarnation of the Doctor per issue? It’s been done (IDW’s The Forgotten). Audio dramas featuring classic Doctors? Also done (The Companion Chronicles). Everything that is being done is a variation on these themes, and while there’s nothing wrong with that per se, I sometimes feel that we are getting some of the same old material with a 50th Anniversary label slapped on it. Everything falls to the quality of the stories (as so much often does), and the stories are actually a mixed bag. And so, I come away from this celebration feeling that all we are getting is more of the same.
I’m not saying all this to be depressing (that’s just an added bonus). I’m saying this because in a news forum I saw a group of fans criticizing Moffat and the BBC because they weren’t really trying to celebrate the anniversary; they were only milking it for more money. The fans complained that Moffat and the BBC only wanted ratings and didn’t want to pay tribute to the classic series, only the current series. And I guess my response is: what do you want? What do you want from the 50th anniversary? What could Moffat and the BBC possibly do that hasn’t already been done? I’m can be as critical of new Who as anyone, but I’m willing to cut Moffat some slack here. Is it possible that the 50th will be a letdown? Absolutely! And I think it is our fault because we have expected so much from Doctor Who over the course of these 50 years. It is done virtually everything it could possibly do—it even came back from the dead! How could Doctor Who possibly top that?
When it comes to my personal celebration of the 50th anniversary, I’m just going to be excited for everyone who ever worked on the show. It is insane that a science fiction television series survived for 50 years. Congratulations to everyone who has ever contributed to that. And hooray to Sydney Newman, Verity Lambert, Waris Hussein, David Whitaker, Donald Wilson, C.E. Webber, Anthony Coburn, William Hartnell, William Russell, Jacqueline Hill, Carole Ann Ford, and all the crew and cast that delivered an amazing show which has done the impossible.

Verity Lambert poses with the original TARDIS crew. Source: Tardis Data Core

Spring Break and Spring Holiday are over. I’m in the down-hill stretch of my semester, which has really interfered with my blogging pace. Papers on redaction criticism and comparative criticism have dominated the past couple of weeks, and the next two weeks have two document design projects which are demanding my attention. And I was making such good progress in “The Key to Time.”
I was filled with dismay when, after two episodes, I had failed to get in to this story. I have seen The Pirate Planet quite a few times. I know what to expect. The jokes aren’t funny to me anymore. But starting with episode three, I was enthralled. And when I look back on it, episode three is when the plot starts to pay off what the first two episodes had set up. The tone shifted from frivolity to complicated concepts punctuated by humor. The Captain has shifted from a bombastic blowhard to a tortured slave; a story of genocidal greed turned into a story about resurrection. This story was positively bursting with wonderful ideas, and the four episodes are struggling to contain them. In the end, everything becomes a bit rushed and confusing.

In so many ways, this story should have been amazing. Conceptually, it is quite clever. Underworld is a retelling of the story of Jason and the Argonauts but as a sci-fi story. The script is quite clever with how it plays with these themes. And the idea of mining Greek myths for science fiction plots is a very good one (sadly, Doctor Who has not made this work, but the idea is sound). Underworld makes good use of this initially, as part one is actually quite intriguing. The myth elements are established. There is even a fascinating revelation that the Minyan society, from which the heroes are descended, was destroyed after Time Lord interference. The Time Lords had shared their technology with the Minyans, who eventually destroyed themselves. This led to the Time Lord non-intervention policies. Part one leaves the viewer with the idea that something epic is about to unfold.
